Buying guide

Nx Cloud alternative: when a focused remote cache is a better fit

Nx Cloud is a great product for teams that want distributed task execution, cloud runners, and a managed cache in one platform. But not every team needs the full platform - some only need the remote cache, with flat pricing that does not grow as the team does. This guide explains the real difference, and honestly describes when each is the right call.

What is Nx Cloud?

Nx Cloud is the official cloud platform built by the Nx team. It is a full execution platform: distributed task execution (DTE) across multiple CI agents, managed cloud runners you can launch on demand, first-party analytics across all Nx workspace features, and a remote cache that ships as part of the same subscription.

Because it is built and maintained by the same team that builds Nx itself, it integrates deeply with the Nx CLI and gets new features whenever Nx adds new platform capabilities. If your team needs distributed execution across dozens of agents and wants a single managed product that covers the whole workflow, Nx Cloud is designed exactly for that.

When Nx Cloud is the right choice

Nx Cloud is the right call when one or more of the following apply:

  • You need distributed task execution. DTE is Nx Cloud's core differentiator: it splits a single Nx run across multiple CI agents so a build that takes 20 minutes on one machine takes 3-4 minutes across five. No other product in this space does that at the same depth of integration with the Nx graph.
  • You want managed cloud runners. Nx Cloud lets you spin up ephemeral agents from the platform rather than paying for always-on CI capacity. If CI runner management is a pain point, this is a compelling reason to stay on the platform.
  • You want first-party Nx support. The Nx team owns the cache protocol, the DTE scheduler, and the analytics - you are never relying on a third-party implementation of a spec they wrote.
  • You are already buying into the Nx Cloud platform. If you use flaky-test detection, workspace analytics, or the Nx Cloud web interface as a workflow tool, the remote cache is essentially included.

When a focused alternative is a better fit

A focused managed remote cache like Cachely is the better fit when:

  • You only need the cache, not the platform. If your team does not use DTE or cloud runners, you are paying for capabilities you do not use. A focused alternative covers exactly what you need at a lower operational surface area.
  • Pricing predictability matters. Nx Cloud is priced on usage and seats - the bill climbs as you add developers, bots, CI actors, and workspaces. A flat subscription priced on storage and network limits stays the same regardless of team size.
  • You run Turborepo or Gradle alongside Nx. Cachely speaks the Nx remote cache protocol, the Turborepo remote cache protocol, and the Gradle HTTP Build Cache protocol. One cache, one subscription, one set of tokens, all three tools.
  • You need explicit read-only enforcement for untrusted builds. Cachely enforces token scopes at the API: a read-only token cannot write even if an attacker tries. This closes the CVE-2025-36852 cache-poisoning attack with a hard API boundary, not just policy.
  • You are replacing @nx/s3-cache or a DIY self-hosted cache. The deprecated Nx Powerpack cache packages (@nx/s3-cache, @nx/gcs-cache, @nx/azure-cache) are vulnerable to cache poisoning and will not be patched. Cachely is a managed implementation of the same Nx remote cache spec Nx points migrators at - two environment variables and no bucket to manage. For the bucket-specific options, see the Nx S3 cache guide.

Side-by-side comparison

The table below reflects publicly documented behaviour. For a deeper breakdown, see the full Cachely vs Nx Cloud comparison.

Side by side

Cachely vs Nx Cloud

Cachely versus Nx Cloud compared feature by feature.
DimensionCachelyNx Cloud
Pricing modelFlat subscription priced on storage and network limits. Team size, workspace count, and CI volume do not change the bill.Usage and seat-based. Cost scales with team size and CI volume.
Product scopeFocused managed remote cache - storage, ROI reporting, and cache-poisoning safety. No execution platform.Full platform: distributed task execution, cloud runners, cache, and workspace analytics.
Operations burdenFully managed on Cloudflare R2 - no infrastructure, no version upgrades, no on-call.Vendor-managed SaaS - no infra to run yourself.
Security: untrusted PR buildsRead-only tokens enforced at the API. A write with a read-only token is rejected with 403. Immutable artifacts (409 on overwrite). Closes CVE-2025-36852 with a hard boundary.Platform-managed within Nx Cloud. Controlled through the Nx Cloud product.
ObservabilityHit rate, slowest tasks, CI minutes and cost saved, per-tool insights, build optimisation suggestions.Rich analytics scoped to the Nx Cloud platform and Nx task graph.
Multi-tool supportNx, Turborepo, and Gradle over one token. Same workspace, same subscription.Nx-first. Turborepo is not a first-class use case.
Distributed task executionOut of scope - Cachely is a cache, not a runner.Yes - a core part of the platform and a key differentiator.
Free tierFree plan available: 1 GiB storage, 500,000 requests/month, no credit card required.Free tier available with Nx Cloud's current plan structure.

Comparison reflects publicly documented behaviour as of 2026. Nx Cloud may have changed since; let us know and we will update the page. For more detail, see the full Cachely vs Nx Cloud page.

Pricing model differences

The most common reason teams look for an Nx Cloud pricing alternative is predictability. Nx Cloud charges on usage and seats, which means the bill grows in two directions at once: as the team grows and as CI volume grows. For a fast-moving team, this can create unwanted surprises at billing time.

Cachely takes a different approach. The subscription is priced on storage and monthly requests - the two things that actually cost money to serve. There are no per-seat fees, no per-workspace fees, and no credit meter to watch. You pay the same flat rate whether you have five developers or fifty, one workspace or ten.

The full pricing details are on the pricing page. The free tier is a real usable cache with no credit card required; the paid plan raises the storage and request limits.

Security posture for untrusted PR builds

The cache-poisoning attack (CVE-2025-36852, CREEP) happens when a pull-request or fork build can write to a cache that trusted builds later read. An attacker can plant a malicious artifact in a PR and have a developer or CI agent execute it when it pulls from cache.

The fix has two parts:

  • Read-only tokens for untrusted builds. Issue PR and fork workflows a read-only token so they can fetch artifacts for speed but cannot write anything. Cachely enforces this at the API: a write attempt with a read-only token returns 403 before any storage is touched.
  • Immutable artifacts. Once a cache key is written, it cannot be overwritten. A re-upload returns 409 Conflict, so a known-good build result is permanent. Even a leaked read-write token cannot silently replace an artifact that already exists.

Set this up by creating two tokens in your Cachely workspace: a read-write token stored as a protected secret used by main and release branches, and a read-only token used by pull-request workflows. Store them as separate CI secrets and never expose the read-write token to fork-triggered workflows. The setup guide has exact environment variable instructions.

Getting started with Cachely

Cachely implements the same Nx self-hosted remote cache protocol Nx already supports. For most teams, migrating from Nx Cloud or a DIY cache takes less than ten minutes:

  • Create a Cachely account and workspace - the free tier requires no credit card.
  • Generate a read-write token for protected branches and a read-only token for pull-request builds.
  • Set two environment variables on every machine that runs Nx builds: NX_SELF_HOSTED_REMOTE_CACHE_SERVER=https://remote.cachely.dev and NX_SELF_HOSTED_REMOTE_CACHE_ACCESS_TOKEN=<your-token>. What each one does, and the trailing-path mistake to avoid, is covered in NX_SELF_HOSTED_REMOTE_CACHE_SERVER explained.
  • For Turborepo builds, set TURBO_API, TURBO_TOKEN, and TURBO_TEAM to the same cache host and token.
  • Run a build - the first run populates the cache and the second should show cache hits.

Full step-by-step instructions, including how to configure GitHub Actions secrets and how to validate that cache hits are working, are in the docs.

For a detailed comparison of how Cachely sits relative to the full alternatives landscape, see the comparisons hub. For a self-hosted path instead of managed, see Cachely vs a self-hosted Nx cache.

Bottom line

The right tool for each team

Choose Nx Cloud when you need distributed task execution and managed cloud runners as part of your CI workflow - it is the best integrated platform for teams that use the full Nx suite and want everything in one place.

Choose Cachely when you only need the remote cache and want flat, predictable pricing that does not scale with headcount - especially if you also run Turborepo or Gradle, if you need strong read-only enforcement for untrusted PR builds, or if you are migrating off the deprecated @nx/s3-cache packages and want a managed drop-in rather than another piece of infrastructure to run.

FAQ

Nx Cloud alternative: common questions

Is Cachely a replacement for Nx Cloud?
No. Nx Cloud is a full platform - distributed task execution, cloud runners, and a managed cache priced on usage and seats. Cachely is a focused Nx Cloud alternative for teams that only need the remote cache: managed storage, ROI reporting, read-only tokens for untrusted PR builds, and flat pricing with no per-seat fees.
When should I choose Nx Cloud over Cachely?
Choose Nx Cloud when you want distributed task execution and managed cloud runners alongside the cache - the full platform experience in one subscription. It is also the natural choice for teams already deep in the Nx ecosystem who want first-party support and integrated analytics across all Nx features.
When is Cachely a better Nx Cloud alternative?
Cachely is a better fit when you only need the remote cache and want predictable flat pricing that does not scale with team size. It is also a better choice when you need read-only token enforcement at the API to close CVE-2025-36852, when your security policy requires clear separation between the cache API and the rest of your CI platform, or when you also run Turborepo or Gradle builds and want one shared cache for all of them.
How does Nx Cloud pricing compare to Cachely?
Nx Cloud is priced on usage and seats - the bill grows as your team, CI volume, or workspace count grows. Cachely is a flat subscription priced on storage and network limits only, so adding more developers, bots, CI actors, and workspaces does not change the cost.
Can I self-host Cachely as an Nx cache alternative?
Cachely itself is a managed service, not self-hosted software. If you need a fully self-hosted Nx cache alternative, you can run your own server that implements the Nx remote cache OpenAPI spec (for example nx-cache-server). Cachely's trade-off is that you get the same cache without running or patching the infrastructure yourself.
Does Cachely protect against the Nx cache-poisoning attack (CVE-2025-36852)?
Yes. Issue read-only tokens to pull-request and fork builds so they can read the cache but never write a poisoned artifact. Cachely enforces read-only at the API - a write with a read-only token is rejected with a 403. Artifacts are also immutable once written: a re-upload of an existing key returns 409 Conflict, so a known-good build can never be silently replaced.
Does Cachely work for both Nx and Turborepo?
Yes. The same workspace token authenticates Nx (via NX_SELF_HOSTED_REMOTE_CACHE_SERVER NX_SELF_HOSTED_REMOTE_CACHE_ACCESS_TOKEN), Turborepo (via TURBO_API TURBO_TOKEN TURBO_TEAM), and Gradle builds. Each protocol is namespaced separately so artifacts never collide.
Is there a free tier for Cachely?
Yes. A free plan is available for individual developers: 1 GiB of managed storage and up to 500,000 cache requests per month, no credit card required. Paid plans raise those limits on a flat subscription.